Multiple Sclerosis: SPMS
Interventions of Interest For questions please contact Becca Piltch, Program Manager, bpiltch@icer.org. View the Key Stakeholder List.
Interventions of Interest For questions please contact Becca Piltch, Program Manager, bpiltch@icer.org. View the Key Stakeholder List.
Interventions of Interest For questions please contact Madeline Booth, Program Manager, mbooth@icer.org. View the Key Stakeholder List.
Interventions of Interest For questions please contact Temiwunmi Shobanke, Program Manager, tshobanke@icer.org. View the Key Stakeholder List.
Interventions of Interest The independent appraisal committee voted that current evidence is adequate to demonstrate superior net health benefits for tabelecleucel when compared to usual care; tabelecleucel would achieve common thresholds for cost-effectiveness if priced between $143,900 to $273,700 per treatment cycle. Final Documents For questions or to request a Spanish translated Report-at-a-Glance or ICER […]
Interventions of Interest The independent appraisal committee voted that current evidence is adequate to demonstrate superior net health benefits for tafamidis, acoramidis, and vutrisiran when compared to no disease-specific therapy. Tafamidis and acoramidis would achieve common thresholds for cost-effectiveness if priced between $13,600 to $39,000 per year. Final Documents For questions please contact info@icer.org. View […]
Interventions of Interest An independent appraisal committee voted that the current evidence is not adequate to demonstrate net health benefits for imetelstat added to best supportive care when compared to best supportive care alone. Imetelstat would meet common thresholds of cost effectiveness if priced between $94,800 to $113,000 per year. The therapy currently priced at […]
Interventions of Interest An independent appraisal committee voted that current evidence is adequate to demonstrate superior net health benefits for ensifentrine added to maintenance therapy compared to maintenance therapy alone. ICER calculated a health-benefit price benchmark (HBPB) for ensifentrine between $7,500 to $12,700 per year, and the therapy is priced at $35,400 per year Final […]
Interventions of Interest Independent appraisal committee voted that current evidence is not adequate to demonstrate superior net health benefits for MDMA-AP compared to short-term trauma-focused psychotherapies. Click here for “Five Fast Facts on ICER and our PTSD Report.” For questions or to request a Spanish translated Report-at-a-Glance or ICER Snapshot for this assessment, please contact info@icer.org. […]
Interventions of Interest The independent appraisal committee voted that the current evidence is not adequate to demonstrate a net health benefit for iptacopan over a C5 inhibitor, although use in treatment-experienced patients with clinically significant extravascular hemolysis received more favorable votes. The committee also found that at current pricing, iptacopan represents “low” long-term value for […]
Interventions of Interest: The independent appraisal committee voted that current evidence is not adequate to demonstrate superior net health benefits for KarXT compared to generically available aripiprazole. If long-term data confirm KarXT’s benefits and lack of weight gain, it would achieve common thresholds for cost-effectiveness if priced between $16,000 to $20,000 per year. Final Documents […]